IN RE: the CLAIM OF Christopher WHITE (2001)

Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed January 19, 2000, which ruled that claimant had given timely notice of injury.

 The Workers' Compensation Board is entitled to assess the credibility of witnesses and “is the sole and final arbiter of whether the testimony of a particular witness is worthy of belief” (Matter of Altman v. Hazan Import Corp., 198 A.D.2d 674, 604 N.Y.S.2d 274).   On the issue of whether claimant gave timely notice of the work-related nature of his injury to the employer, claimant's testimony, which is supported by that of his wife, is not replete with inconsistencies in the face of unimpeached testimony of impartial witnesses and, therefore, there is no basis to disturb the Board's decision to credit his testimony (compare, Matter of Jhoda v. Mauser Serv., 279 A.D.2d 853, 854, 719 N.Y.S.2d 388, with Matter of Lewis v. Cambridge Filter Corp., 132 A.D.2d 802, 803, 517 N.Y.S.2d 342, lv. denied 71 N.Y.2d 805, 529 N.Y.S.2d 76, 524 N.E.2d 430).   The forms upon which the employer and its workers' compensation carrier rely constitute some evidence that the testimony of claimant and his wife was incredible but did not preclude the Board from exercising its authority to determine whether the testimony was worthy of belief (see, Matter of Konstantinakos v. Plaza Hotel, 93 A.D.2d 927, 928, 462 N.Y.S.2d 326).

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.