Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Aileen KUSHNER, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner was formerly employed as a nurse at Nassau University Medical Center. In the course of her employment, she suffered a neck and shoulder strain while attempting to relocate several patients. In light of her injuries, petitioner's physician recommended that she cease her work activities.
Approximately two months later, petitioner applied to respondent New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System for disability retirement benefits. Her application was denied and she requested an administrative hearing for reconsideration of her application. The Judicial Hearing Officer (hereinafter JHO) again denied the application, finding that petitioner had not availed herself of all recommended safe and available treatment opportunities. Thereafter, respondent Comptroller adopted the findings of the JHO and issued a final determination denying petitioner's application. Petitioner then commenced the instant proceeding seeking annulment of the determination that she is ineligible for benefits. This proceeding was transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g).
Notably, the parties agree that the JHO's decision lacks substantial evidentiary support for the determination that petitioner failed to avail herself of all recommended safe and available treatments-specifically, epidural injections (see generally Matter of Curtin v. Hevesi, 57 A.D.3d 1178, 1178, 869 N.Y.S.2d 659 [2008] )-and that the matter should be remitted. Thus, we agree that remittal is appropriate (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 74[b]; Matter of Rossi v. New York State Comptroller, 55 A.D.3d 1125, 1126-1127, 866 N.Y.S.2d 399 [2008]; Matter of Bunting v. McCall, 280 A.D.2d 774, 774-775, 719 N.Y.S.2d 907 [2001]; see also Matter of Foos v. Bausch & Lomb, 181 A.D.2d 951, 953, 581 N.Y.S.2d 458 [1992]; cf. Matter of Varriano v. Hevesi, 40 A.D.3d 1357, 1359, 837 N.Y.S.2d 381 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 815, 849 N.Y.S.2d 31, 879 N.E.2d 171 [2007] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent Comptroller for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
STEIN, J.
ROSE, J.P., KANE, KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 07, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)