Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Stephen JAVELINE, etc., Petitioner, v. Dennis WHALEN, etc., Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, Dennis Whalen, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, dated March 11, 2000, made after a hearing, which found that the deceased was ineligible for medical assistance for a period of 6.803 months because she had transferred assets to the petitioner for less than fair market value within the previous 36 months before applying for assistance.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The deceased, Shirley Javeline, transferred three certificates of deposit worth a total of $70,000, constituting virtually all of her assets, to the petitioner, her son, Stephen Javeline, approximately two weeks after her admission to the hospital for a syncopal episode, later determined to be a transient ischemic attack. One month earlier, she had experienced dizziness.
Approximately two weeks after the transfer, the deceased fell and broke her hip. She also suffered a heart attack. While in the hospital, she experienced a stroke and required long-term care. A few months after the transfer, she was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, arteriosclerosis, and vascular heart disease.
Given the evidence of the deceased's medical condition at the time the transfer was made and the lack of other evidence showing that the transfer was made solely for reasons other than to qualify for medical assistance, the petitioner failed to justify the transfer of assets (see, Social Services Law § 366[5][c][3][iii]; Matter of Brunswick Hosp. Ctr. v. Wing, 249 A.D.2d 385, 671 N.Y.S.2d 123; Matter of Carter v. Brandwein, 182 A.D.2d 620, 582 N.Y.S.2d 223).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 19, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)