Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
237 W. 230 STREET REALTY CORP., plaintiff, v. CASTLE OIL CORPORATION, et al., respondents, Trans Service Corporation, appellant, et al., defendants.
In an action to recover property damages resulting from the discharge of petroleum, the defendant Trans Service Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.), entered March 3, 2005, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Castle Oil Corporation and Old Republic Insurance Co. which was for summary judgment on their cross claim for indemnification against the defendant Trans Service Corporation.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
As the Supreme Court correctly determined, the defendants Castle Oil Corporation (hereinafter Castle) and Old Republic Insurance Co. demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by establishing that the agreement between Castle and the defendant Trans Service Corporation (hereinafter Trans Service) unambiguously required the latter to indemnify Castle even if Castle was negligent and that, in any event, Castle was free of negligence in the incident giving rise to the plaintiff's claim in this action (see Margolin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 32 N.Y.2d 149, 153, 344 N.Y.S.2d 336, 297 N.E.2d 80; Levine v. Shell Oil Co., 28 N.Y.2d 205, 211-212, 321 N.Y.S.2d 81, 269 N.E.2d 799; New York Tel. Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 203 A.D.2d 26, 28, 609 N.Y.S.2d 244). In opposition, Trans Service failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 26, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)