Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Lamonte JOHNSON, appellant, v. Charles J. HYNES, etc., respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the production of certain documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law article 6), the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated March 9, 1998, as denied that branch of his petition which was to compel the production of the statements of witnesses who did not testify at his trial and the eyewitness's “cooperation agreement”.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner was convicted of two counts of murder in the second degree based, in part, upon the testimony of an eyewitness (see, People v. Johnson, 170 A.D.2d 535, 566 N.Y.S.2d 538). The petitioner subsequently commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to obtain, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law article 6) (hereinafter FOIL), among other things, disclosure of the statements of witnesses who did not testify at his trial, as well as the eyewitness's cooperation agreement. Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the statements of nontestifying witnesses are confidential and not disclosable under FOIL (see, Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [e][iii]; Matter of Moore v. Santucci, 151 A.D.2d 677, 543 N.Y.S.2d 103; Matter of Spencer v. New York State Police, 187 A.D.2d 919, 591 N.Y.S.2d 207).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 20, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)