Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas AVILES, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Inmate Standards & Behavior, Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances after two EMIT urinalysis tests resulted in positive readings for the presence of cannabinoids. Challenging the determination, petitioner claims that the positive test results were caused by a prescription medication that he was taking at the time his urine was tested. However, the misbehavior report and positive test results, together with the testimony presented at the hearing, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Hernandez v. McGinnis, 251 A.D.2d 769, 674 N.Y.S.2d 796; Matter of Lopez v. Goord, 242 A.D.2d 816, 661 N.Y.S.2d 1026). We find no error in the Hearing Officer's reliance on the testimony of the correctional facility nurse which refuted evidence submitted by petitioner that the prescription drug he was taking caused a false positive (see, Matter of Lopez v. Goord, supra, at 816-817, 661 N.Y.S.2d 1026). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent that they have preserved for our review, have been considered and found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 16, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)