Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Cy GREENE, Petitioner, v. E.A. COUTURE, as Superintendent of Gouverneur Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier II hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from refusing a direct order, creating a disturbance and unauthorized exchange. The misbehavior report alleged that petitioner was using and playing another inmate's headphones and tape player without authorization in a loud volume. Petitioner then refused a direct order to leave the desk area where he confronted the reporting officer over the transgression. Petitioner's administrative appeal of the determination of guilt was unsuccessful. He then commenced the instant article 78 proceeding.
Contrary to petitioner's argument, the detailed misbehavior report, combined with petitioner's own testimony, provide substantial evidence of his guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). We are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that the fact that the Hearing Officer found him not guilty of a charge of interfering with an employee establishes that he also should have been found not guilty of the disobeying a direct order charge. We have also examined petitioner's numerous allegations of Hearing Officer bias and find them to be unsubstantiated in the record.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)