Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MARY ALICE V. (Anonymous). Angel Guardian Home, respondent; Hugh V. (Anonymous), Sr., et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Malinda V. (Anonymous). Angel Guardian Home, respondent; Hugh V. (Anonymous), Sr., et al., appellants. (Proceeding No. 2)
In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b and Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of two orders of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J), both entered May 5, 1997, as, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated his parental rights to Mary Alice V. and Malinda V. on the grounds of abandonment and permanent neglect and transferred custody and guardianship of the two children to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for purposes of adoption, and the mother separately appeals from the same orders.
ORDERED that the appeals by the mother are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to timely perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 670.8.[e] ).
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from by the father, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner met its burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence the father's abandonment and permanent neglect of the two children (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824; Matter of Fatima Danet F., 233 A.D.2d 504, 650 N.Y.S.2d 984). The father admitted that he failed to have contact with either the children or the petitioner in the six months prior to the filing of the petition, and repeated efforts by the petitioner to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship were ignored by the father without excuse. Accordingly, the father's parental rights were properly terminated.
The father's remaining contention is without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 27, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)