Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Daniel CARACCIOLO, appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., respondents., et al., defendants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated September 30, 2005, as granted those branches of the respective motions of the defendants Allstate Insurance Company, The Rosenberg Agency, Inc., and Bradan, Inc., and the defendants Davidoff Beauty Salon and Yura Davidoff, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he slipped and fell on ice that had formed on the public sidewalk in front of the premises of the defendants Allstate Insurance Company, The Rosenberg Agency, Inc., and Bradan, Inc. Their independent snow removal contractor had removed the snow from the sidewalk and had piled it adjacent to the sidewalk. The snow then melted, ran across the sidewalk, and refroze. The adjacent premises were leased by the defendants Davidoff Beauty Salon and Yura Davidoff. In support of their motions, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, the moving defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they had no duty to pedestrians such as the plaintiff to remove snow from the public sidewalk, since the applicable provision of the local code did not impose tort liability (see Klotz v. City of New York, 9 A.D.3d 392, 393, 781 N.Y.S.2d 357; Rao v. Hatanian, 2 A.D.3d 616, 617, 768 N.Y.S.2d 335; Negron v. G.R.A. Realty, Inc., 307 A.D.2d 282, 762 N.Y.S.2d 287). In the absence of such a duty, the moving defendants were not liable for the creation of any dangerous condition by the independent contractor who removed the snow (cf. Olivieri v. GM Realty Co., LLC, 37 A.D.3d 569, 830 N.Y.S.2d 284). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)