Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas KENNEDY, Petitioner, v. Philip COOMBE, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possession of escape paraphernalia and unauthorized possession of tools. Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt on the ground that it was not based upon substantial evidence. We disagree. Presented in evidence at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was a detailed misbehavior report together with the testimony of the correction officer who had found five hacksaw blades secreted in a leg of petitioner's bed. The blades themselves were also admitted in evidence. We conclude that there was substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Torres v. Coughlin, 213 A.D.2d 861, 624 N.Y.S.2d 67). Petitioner's assertion that he had no knowledge of the presence of the blades concealed in his cell was insufficient to defeat the inference of possession that arises whenever a weapon is found in an area under an inmate's control (see, Matter of Price v. Coughlin, 195 A.D.2d 995, 600 N.Y.S.2d 408). His testimony in this regard raised issues of credibility which were within the province of the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Patterson v. Senkowski, 204 A.D.2d 831, 832, 612 N.Y.S.2d 84). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)