Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tyrone WARE, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered December 15, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree.
A report that defendant had killed his girlfriend led police officers to enter and search the apartment that she shared with him, as well as the backyard of the apartment building where they discovered the victim's body. When police approached defendant to apprehend him, he began crying and apologizing for killing the victim. He was indicted for the crimes of murder in the second degree (three counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. Following a combined Huntley/ Wade/Mapp hearing, County Court denied defendant's motions to suppress his statements to police and evidence found at the apartment. Thereafter, pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of murder in the second degree and waived his right to appeal in exchange for receiving a prison sentence of 20 years to life. Defendant appeals.
We note that defendant does not challenge the voluntariness of the plea or his appeal waiver, and the record confirms that both were knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. As a result, his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury is foreclosed by his guilty plea and his challenges to County Court's denial of his suppression motions and the severity of his sentence are precluded by his waiver of his right to appeal (see e.g. People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006]; People v. Hansen, 95 N.Y.2d 227, 232, 715 N.Y.S.2d 369, 738 N.E.2d 773 [2000]; People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831, 833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 59, 724 N.E.2d 754 [1999] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
ROSE, J.
PETERS, J.P., SPAIN, MUGGLIN and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)