Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eric MOORE, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered May 25, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services calculating the length of petitioner's sentence.
Petitioner, having been convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, was sentenced in 1983 to seven years to life in prison. Following his release to parole supervision in 1992, he committed and was convicted of 17 additional felonies and sentenced in 1994 as a persistent violent felony offender on 16 counts and a second felony offender on one count to an aggregate prison term of 20 years to life. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding contending that his 1994 sentences should be construed as running concurrently with the remaining years on the preexisting unexpired 1983 sentence, instead of consecutively thereto, because the 1994 commitment order was silent in that respect. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.
We affirm. Penal Law § 70.25(2-a) requires that petitioner's 1994 sentences, imposed as a persistent violent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.08) and a second felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.06), run consecutively to the prior undischarged 1983 sentence, notwithstanding the fact that the sentencing court was silent as to the manner in which the 1994 sentences would run against his prior sentence (see Matter of Adams v. Goord, 29 A.D.3d 1237, 1238, 817 N.Y.S.2d 159 [2006]; Matter of El-Aziz v. Goord, 27 A.D.3d 861, 862, 811 N.Y.S.2d 181 [2006], lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 704, 819 N.Y.S.2d 871, 853 N.E.2d 242 [2006]; Matter of Williams v. Goord, 25 A.D.3d 838, 838, 805 N.Y.S.2d 859 [2006], lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 701, 818 N.Y.S.2d 192, 850 N.E.2d 1167 [2006]; accord Matter of Tafari v. Goord, 31 A.D.3d 843, 843-844, 817 N.Y.S.2d 754 [2006]; Matter of Martinez v. Goord, 30 A.D.3d 868, 869, 816 N.Y.S.2d 689 [2006]; Matter of Valentin v. Smith, 30 A.D.3d 862, 863, 817 N.Y.S.2d 717 [2006] ). Thus, we find unavailing petitioner's assertion that the length of his sentence was incorrectly calculated.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
SPAIN, J.
CARDONA, P.J., MUGGLIN, LAHTINEN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 02, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)