Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: AYANA JEAN L. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; Sandra Jean L. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent; Phillip Jean L. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), dated August 5, 2004, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated March 31, 2004, made after a hearing, finding that he neglected the subject child, released the child to the custody of the mother for a period of 12 months, and thereafter to his custody and that of the mother under the supervision of a child protective agency, social services official, or duly authorized agency, and granted an order of protection, inter alia, directing him to stay away from the subject child for a period of 12 months. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review the fact-finding order.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as granted an order of protection is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the order of protection has expired (see Matter of Matthew C., 300 A.D.2d 394, 751 N.Y.S.2d 749; Matter of Joey T., 185 A.D.2d 851, 587 N.Y.S.2d 356); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the father's contention, the testimony adduced at the fact-finding hearing was sufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he exercised inadequate guardianship (see Matter of Alan B., 267 A.D.2d 306, 700 N.Y.S.2d 200), and neglected the child by virtue of his abuse of marijuana, which placed the physical, mental, and emotional condition of the child in imminent danger of becoming impaired (see Family Ct. Act §§ 1012[f][i][B], 1046[a][iii]; Matter of Sade W., 286 A.D.2d 770, 730 N.Y.S.2d 721; Matter of Shyasia L., 286 A.D.2d 391, 391-392, 728 N.Y.S.2d 712; Matter of Krewsean S., 273 A.D.2d 393, 394, 709 N.Y.S.2d 616; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Corrine B.] v. Margaret D., 221 A.D.2d 439, 633 N.Y.S.2d 566).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 14, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)