Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: PROGRESSIVE NORTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner-respondent, v. James BARNES, Jr., respondent; State Farm Insurance Company, proposed additional respondent-appellant, et al., proposed additional respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, State Farm Insurance Company appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated June 3, 2005, which, after a framed issue hearing, granted the petition, and (2) an order of the same court dated October 5, 2005, which denied its motion for leave to renew and reargue.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order dated October 5, 2005, as denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated June 3, 2005, is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated October 5, 2005, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to Progressive Northeastern Insurance Company.
Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313(2)(a), State Farm Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) was required to file a notice of cancellation with the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles no later than 30 days following June 17, 2002, the effective cancellation date of the policy it issued to Guy F. DeSantis, a/k/a Gaetano F. DeSantis. Failure to strictly comply with this provision results in invalid termination of coverage as to third parties (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313[3]; Matter of Progressive N. Ins. Co. v. White, 23 A.D.3d 477, 478, 808 N.Y.S.2d 108). State Farm did not comply with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313(2)(a) and, therefore, the termination of coverage was not effective with respect to the claim made by James Barnes, Jr., arising out of a May 31, 2004, accident (see Matter of Chubb Group of Ins. Cos. v. Williams, 14 A.D.3d 561, 562, 789 N.Y.S.2d 66; Matter of Material Damage Adj. Corp. v. King, 1 A.D.3d 439, 440, 766 N.Y.S.2d 695; cf. Matter of Rosenberg v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 274 A.D.2d 520, 712 N.Y.S.2d 384). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition to permanently stay arbitration pursuant to the uninsured motorist provision of the policy issued by Progressive Northeastern Insurance Company.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 13, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)