Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Joseph BOGERT Jr., Respondent, v. E.B. DESIGN AIR, INC., et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed January 11, 2006, which ruled that claimant's injury arose out of and in the course of his employment and awarded claimant workers' compensation benefits.
Claimant was injured while playing softball at a company picnic organized by the employer. He filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits and the employer's workers' compensation carrier controverted coverage. After a hearing, claimant was found to have suffered a work-related injury. The carrier and employer sought review. The Workers' Compensation Board ultimately affirmed, and the employer and carrier appeal.
Workers' Compensation Law § 10(1) sets forth three conditions under which workers' compensation benefits may be awarded for injuries incurred during voluntary participation in an off-duty athletic activity that is not a part of the employee's work-related duties. Specifically, an award is foreclosed under section 10 unless “the employer (1) required the employee to participate in the activity, (2) paid the worker to do so, or (3) sponsored the activity” (Matter of Dorosz v. Green & Seifter, 92 N.Y.2d 672, 676, 685 N.Y.S.2d 406, 708 N.E.2d 162 [1999] ). This case involves the condition applicable when the employer sponsors the activity, which is established by evidence of “some type of affirmative act or overt encouragement by the employer” (Matter of Kobre v. Camp Mogen Avraham, 255 A.D.2d 636, 637, 679 N.Y.S.2d 753 [1998]; see Matter of Dorosz v. Green & Seifter, supra at 676, 685 N.Y.S.2d 406, 708 N.E.2d 162; Matter of Koch v. Rockland County Sheriff's Dept., 289 A.D.2d 865, 866, 734 N.Y.S.2d 697 [2001], lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 601, 744 N.Y.S.2d 761, 771 N.E.2d 834 [2002]; Matter of Baker v. Sentry Group, 269 A.D.2d 668, 703 N.Y.S.2d 299 [2000] ). Such a determination is a factual issue for the Board which will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Eddy v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transp. Auth., 248 A.D.2d 769, 770, 669 N.Y.S.2d 699 [1998] ). Here, the record demonstrates that the employer disseminated notice of and organized both the picnic and the softball game, paid for use of the picnic site, and provided food. Further, notice of the picnic asked employees to “bring a glove” for the softball game, and the employer paid for rental of the balls, bats and bases. Given these facts, we conclude that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's finding that the employer sponsored the off-duty athletic activity that caused claimant's injury such that the injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
PETERS, MUGGLIN and KANE, JJ., concur.
MERCURE, J.P.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 22, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)