Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Stoney HARRISON, Petitioner, v. M. BERTONE, as Correctional Sergeant, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Having given another inmate two batteries, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized exchange of personal property. At the conclusion of the ensuing tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and hearing testimony from both petitioner and the inmate to whom he gave the batteries (see Matter of Harvey v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 1096, 1096, 850 N.Y.S.2d 268 [2008] ). Petitioner's conclusory assertion that he had received the appropriate permission to loan the batteries created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Humphrey v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 845, 845, 839 N.Y.S.2d 859 [2007] ). To the extent preserved, we have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that the penalty imposed was excessive, and find them to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 29, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)