Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph VIDAL, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
During a search of petitioner's cell, correction officers discovered a number of items including 722 stamps, another inmate's legal papers, another inmate's watch and an extra state-issued identification card. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing unauthorized property, providing unauthorized legal assistance, engaging in an unauthorized exchange and possessing an impermissible identification card. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges except for providing unauthorized legal assistance. As a penalty, the Hearing Officer imposed upon petitioner three months of keeplock, loss of packages, commissary and telephone, and directed that 668 of the stamps he possessed be confiscated. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the photograph of the items seized and petitioner's own testimony in which he admitted to possessing an unauthorized number of stamps, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Woodward v. Selsky, 43 A.D.3d 1209, 1210, 841 N.Y.S.2d 411 [2007] ). Petitioner's exculpatory explanations for possessing the items in question presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Hannah v. Burge, 43 A.D.3d 1234, 841 N.Y.S.2d 719 [2007] ). We decline to address petitioner's argument that the stamps were improperly confiscated inasmuch as this is the subject of a separate CPLR article 78 proceeding and petitioner has taken an appeal from Supreme Court's ruling on the matter.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 10, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)