Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ROCKLAND COUNTY PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., respondent, v. COMMISSIONER OF PERSONNEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY, et al., appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of Personnel of Rockland County to hold a non-competitive examination for the civil service position of Chief of Police of the Town of Clarkstown, the Commissioner of Personnel of Rockland County and Rockland County Department of Personnel appeal, and the Town of Clarkstown separately appeals, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated May 22, 1998, which, inter alia, granted the petition, and directed that a promotional list be created from the results of a promotional examination for that position.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The appellants correctly contend that a determination of the Commissioner of Personnel of Rockland County as to eligibility requirements for promotion generally should not be disturbed if any fair argument can be made to support it (see, Matter of Cahill v. Casey, 180 A.D.2d 680, 580 N.Y.S.2d 63; Matter of Quigley v. Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 153 A.D.2d 892, 545 N.Y.S.2d 389). However, it is undisputed that in this case the eligibility requirements set by the Commissioner for promotion to the position of Chief of Police of the Town of Clarkstown would result in only one candidate being certified as eligible to sit for the promotional examination. Hence, the Supreme Court properly determined that, as so limited, the promotional examination would not constitute a competitive examination as required by Rockland County Police Act § 4 (L. 1936, ch. 526, as amended), and granted the petition accordingly.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)