Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Frances WHITE, respondent, v. Richard FREYMAN, etc., et al., appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education, Ossining Union Free School District, dated March 15, 1996, which, after a hearing, affirmed the denial of the petitioner's application pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers' Retirement System, Tier II, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered September 25, 1998, which granted the petition, annulled the determination, and directed the Board of Education, Ossining Union Free School District, to file an appropriate affidavit with the New York State Teachers' Retirement System attesting to the petitioner's eligibility for retroactive membership.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the determination of the Hearing Officer, the petitioner satisfied her initial burden of demonstrating that she met the requirements of Retirement and Social Security Law § 803(b)(3) (see, Matter of Rainson v. Board of Educ. of Manhasset Pub. Schools, 256 A.D.2d 411, 681 N.Y.S.2d 770; cf., Matter of Forlenza v. Board of Educ. of Uniondale Union Free School Dist., 256 A.D.2d 409, 681 N.Y.S.2d 575). The appellants failed to establish that at the time the petitioner was hired they had informed her of her right to join the retirement system. Accordingly, the petition should be granted (see, Matter of Scanlan v. Buffalo Pub. School Sys., 90 N.Y.2d 662, 665 N.Y.S.2d 51, 687 N.E.2d 1334; Matter of Spector v. Board of Educ., 251 A.D.2d 588, 674 N.Y.S.2d 760).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)