Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Eugene STEEL, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered May 16, 1997, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and driving while intoxicated (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court correctly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test. The police found the defendant unconscious in his automobile following an automobile accident. The County Court properly held that the defendant impliedly consented to have his blood withdrawn, as the People established probable cause to arrest the defendant for driving while intoxicated. The determination by the police to refrain from arresting the defendant does not compel a different result, because arresting him would have been an “empty gesture” due to the defendant's physical condition (People v. Goodell, 79 N.Y.2d 869, 871, 581 N.Y.S.2d 157, 589 N.E.2d 380). Furthermore, the court properly admitted the expert testimony of a toxicologist to establish that an anticoagulant and preservatives had been added to the defendant's blood sample (see, People v. Jones, 73 N.Y.2d 427, 430, 541 N.Y.S.2d 340, 539 N.E.2d 96). The defendant's objections went to the weight, rather than the admissibility, of the evidence (see, People v. Scalzi, 102 A.D.2d 952, 953, 477 N.Y.S.2d 808).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)