Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Fernando PIEDRAHITA, et al., appellants, v. RGF DEVELOPMENT CORP., respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated November 19, 2004, as, after a nonjury trial, in effect, awarded $0 in damages to the plaintiff Fernando Piedrahita for past and future lost earnings.
ORDERED that the appeal by the plaintiff Gloria Piedrahita is dismissed, as she is not aggrieved by the judgment insofar as appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiff Fernando Piedrahita, on the law and the facts, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a new trial on the issue of damages for past and future lost earnings, with costs to abide the event.
An alien unauthorized for employment in the United States is not barred from seeking to recover, inter alia, lost wages in a personal injury action to recover damages sustained because of a violation of New York's workplace safety laws (see Balbuena v. IDR Realty, LLC, 6 N.Y.3d 338, 812 N.Y.S.2d 416, 845 N.E.2d 1246, affg. Majlinger v. Cassino Contr. Corp., 25 A.D.3d 14, 802 N.Y.S.2d 56). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a new trial solely on the issue of the plaintiff Fernando Piedrahita's entitlement to past and future lost earnings (id.; see Collins v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 201 A.D.2d 447, 607 N.Y.S.2d 387).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)