Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Mahmond SALAMATIAN, Respondent. Louis Lasky Memorial Medical & Dental Centers, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent. (And Another Related Claim.)
Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 20, 1998, which ruled that Louis Lasky Memorial Medical & Dental Centers was liable for unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.
Louis Lasky Memorial Medical & Dental Centers (hereinafter the Center), a union welfare-funded operated medical facility, challenges the decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which assessed it additional unemployment insurance contributions upon a finding that claimant and other similarly situated physicians are employees rather than independent contractors. We affirm. The record discloses that the Center obtained physicians through advertisements or by word-of-mouth. A physician was scheduled based upon his availability and would call in if he or she was unable to appear as scheduled. All services were provided at the Center, which furnished the medical equipment and supplies, prescription pads, office space and furniture, as well as the support staff who scheduled patient appointments and maintained all of the patients' files. Physicians were required to sign in and out, and were paid a negotiated hourly rate regardless of the number of patients seen. As with claimant, the Center could terminate a physician's services as a result of patient complaints. Under these circumstances, there is substantial evidence to support the Board's conclusion that the Center exercised sufficient over-all control to establish an employer-employee relationship (see, Matter of Seneca Nation of Indians [Sweeney], 247 A.D.2d 732, 669 N.Y.S.2d 85; Matter of South Shore Med. Servs. [Hudacs], 183 A.D.2d 1093, 1094, 583 N.Y.S.2d 686; Matter of Niagara Emergency Physicians Group, 174 A.D.2d 911, 571 N.Y.S.2d 608; Matter of Stat Servs. [Hartnett], 148 A.D.2d 903, 539 N.Y.S.2d 531).
ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)