Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Thomas J. DONAGHY, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 18, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was not totally unemployed and that he made willful false statements to obtain benefits. The record establishes that during part of the time claimant was receiving unemployment insurance benefits he incorporated a computer consulting business, of which he was president and sole shareholder, rented office space, purchased business cards and stationary, consulted with an accountant monthly, went to the office daily to check messages and faxes, and attempted to solicit work. These activities constitute employment (see, Matter of Murak [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 751, 664 N.Y.S.2d 661). Although claimant testified that the corporation was initially started as a shell to seek full-time employment, this merely presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, id.). Inasmuch as claimant failed to report these business start-up activities despite having received the unemployment insurance information booklet which explained the reporting requirements, the finding that he made willful false statements to obtain benefits is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Kaganovich [Commissioner of Labor], 254 A.D.2d 670, 679 N.Y.S.2d 196). Claimant's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the sufficiency of the hearing transcript, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 16, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)