Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Joann FLORA, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 26, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was an office manager for a manufacturing business whose job responsibilities included the payment of health insurance premiums on behalf of certain employees. She was terminated from her employment for continuing to supply medical coverage for former employees without the employer's knowledge. Substantial evidence supports the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant lost her employment under disqualifying circumstances. The record indicates that claimant used the employer's funds to secure 18 months of health insurance for three former employees, namely her father and two uncles, without obtaining the employer's permission. Such unauthorized disbursement of an employer's funds is detrimental to an employer's interest and may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Naymark [Tanagraphics Inc.-Sweeney], 232 A.D.2d 804, 649 N.Y.S.2d 345; see also, Matter of Frascino [Hudacs], 211 A.D.2d 842, 620 N.Y.S.2d 624). Claimant's testimony that the employer authorized the payments merely created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Foster [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 628, 663 N.Y.S.2d 924). We have examined claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)