Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Philip HAREWOOD, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 28, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Following an arbitration hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, claimant was discharged from his employment as a bus operator for the New York City Transit Authority due to misconduct. The arbitrator found that claimant's assault on a passenger in retaliation for the passenger swatting him on the head with informational pamphlets constituted unacceptable conduct warranting his dismissal. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, adopting the arbitrator's factual conclusion, ruled that claimant's conduct constituted disqualifying misconduct. Inasmuch as claimant was afforded a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of his misconduct at the arbitration hearing, the Board was bound by the factual findings of the arbitrator (see, Matter of Rimko [New York City Tr. Auth.-Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 695, 664 N.Y.S.2d 377). Given the arbitrator's findings, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits (see, Matter of Lubin [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 755, 664 N.Y.S.2d 660, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 810, 670 N.Y.S.2d 404, 693 N.E.2d 751).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)