Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Myung H. KIM, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 28, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed. After his employment ended under nondisqualifying circumstances, claimant formed a corporation for the purpose of providing third-party check-cashing services. While he was receiving benefits, claimant filed a certificate of incorporation naming himself vice-president and 50hareholder in the corporation, filed corporate tax returns and solicited loans in an effort to obtain the funds necessary to establish a bank account for business transactions. These activities are sufficient to constitute employment, notwithstanding that they were performed at a time when the corporation was inactive and not profitable (see, Matter of Fitton [Sweeney], 239 A.D.2d 723, 657 N.Y.S.2d 263; Matter of Khurgin [Sweeney], 232 A.D.2d 707, 648 N.Y.S.2d 479, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 815, 659 N.Y.S.2d 856, 681 N.E.2d 1303). Furthermore, given claimant's failure to report these activities to the local unemployment office, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant made willful false statements to obtain benefits (see, Matter of Quarantillo [Sweeney], 226 A.D.2d 877, 641 N.Y.S.2d 154). We have reviewed claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)