Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Yvonne G. PALMITESSO, Appellant. Joseph D. Castado, Doing Business as Sunrise Nursing Home, Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 2, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant was employed for over 40 years with a nursing home which had been owned and operated by her family. In April 1995, after decades of lawsuits, a new owner took possession of the business; claimant tendered her resignation on the same day. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, reversing the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, denied claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. It is well settled that inability to get along with one's employer does not constitute good cause for leaving employment nor does resignation in anticipation of discharge (see generally, Matter of Barney [North Star Indus.-Hudacs], 196 A.D.2d 924, 925, 602 N.Y.S.2d 233). Despite years of litigation between the new owner and claimant's family, the new owner had assured all of the employees, including those related to the previous owners, that their jobs were secure. Furthermore, although the parties dispute the circumstances under which claimant tendered her resignation, this created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve and it was not bound by the credibility determinations of the Administrative Law Judge (see, Matter of Lugo [Milford Mgt.-Commissioner of Labor], 251 A.D.2d 742, 673 N.Y.S.2d 772). Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)