Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Bryan P. CHATTERTON, Appellant. Enesco Imports Inc., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 20, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant challenges the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling that claimant voluntarily left his position as a sales representative without good cause. The record reveals that the employer informed its sales representatives that they would need to purchase personal computers to be used in placing sales orders. When claimant's manager told him that a computer would be necessary in the future in order to perform his job, claimant quit under the mistaken belief that he could not continue working without immediately purchasing a computer. Significantly, other sales representatives continued to work without computers and to submit written orders after claimant left. Under these circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant left his employment in anticipation of discharge, which does not constitute good reason for leaving employment (see, e.g., Matter of Bradley [Hudacs], 190 A.D.2d 949, 593 N.Y.S.2d 596; Matter of Greene [Hartnett], 176 A.D.2d 411, 573 N.Y.S.2d 999). Claimant's remaining contentions, including that the terms of his employment were significantly altered, have been reviewed and found to be unpersuasive.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)