Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Yvonne M. CONNORS, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 20, 1998, which ruled that claimant's request for a hearing was untimely.
By notices mailed September 30, 1994 and October 3, 1994, claimant was found to be ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she did not have sufficient weeks of covered employment in her base period to file a valid original claim and was therefore charged with a recoverable overpayment of benefits. Although claimant testified that she tried to explain her situation to the local unemployment insurance office through numerous letters and telephone calls after receiving the notices, the record establishes that she failed to request a review hearing before an Administrative Law Judge until September 1996. While claimant asserts that she was unaware of her right to request a hearing, the record indicates that she neither read the entire unemployment insurance handbook that she had received nor the notices of determination which set forth the time limits in which to request a hearing. Inasmuch as claimant failed to offer a valid excuse for failing to request a hearing within the 30-day statutory limitation set forth in Labor Law § 620(1)(a), we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant's request for a hearing was untimely (see, Matter of Palmer [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 914, 672 N.Y.S.2d 529; Matter of Capron [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 698, 664 N.Y.S.2d 192).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 15, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)