Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Robert J. CALSI, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 26, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible to receive emergency unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed and that he made willful false statements to obtain benefits. The evidence indicates that while claimant was receiving benefits he and another individual incorporated a business for the purpose of purchasing and renovating residential properties for resale at a profit. Thereafter, claimant performed various services on behalf of the corporation, including providing funds for the purchase and renovation of two properties, attending real estate closings, visiting the properties twice a week in order to insure that the renovations were progressing in a timely fashion, occasionally assisting with carpentry work and regularly writing checks to pay for business expenses. This, Coupled with claimant's failure to report his activities to the local unemployment office, provides substantial evidence for the Board's decision (see, Matter of Albignano [Sweeney], 232 A.D.2d 810, 648 N.Y.S.2d 751; Matter of Quarantillo [Sweeney], 226 A.D.2d 877, 641 N.Y.S.2d 154). We have reviewed claimant's remaining contentions and conclude that they do not warrant a contrary result.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 29, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)