Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Daniel KRAFTON, Appellant, v. David F. MAZZARESE, Respondent.
Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered January 21, 1998 in Chemung County, which awarded plaintiff damages for medical expenses, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking recovery for damages he sustained after defendant twice assaulted him, inflicting a laceration and fracture to his skull. After defendant defaulted by failing to answer, Supreme Court held an inquest on the issue of damages and awarded plaintiff $1,569 for his medical expenses. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff argues that the amount awarded was against the weight of the evidence in that it included no recovery for pain and suffering. We disagree. The record is completely devoid of any evidence regarding plaintiff's pain and suffering. The testimony at the inquest was solely devoted to damages regarding medical expenses. There was absolutely no testimony regarding lost work time, any suffering incurred by plaintiff or any resulting permanent disability (compare, Failla v. Amodeo, 225 A.D.2d 965, 639 N.Y.S.2d 586). In fact, approximately one month after the incident, one of plaintiff's treating physicians opined that plaintiff's prognosis to return to “normalcy” was very good.
As to the $1,569 award for medical treatment, however, we reach a different conclusion. The record establishes that plaintiff's costs for medical treatment amounted to $5,708.82, $2,363.10 of which was paid by insurance. The amount remaining, $3,345.72, represents the uninsured amount of plaintiff's medical expenses. Consequently, we conclude that Supreme Court's award of $1,569 for medical treatment “ ‘could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence’ ” (Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744, 746, 631 N.Y.S.2d 122, 655 N.E.2d 163, quoting Moffatt v. Moffatt, 86 A.D.2d 864, 447 N.Y.S.2d 313, affd. 62 N.Y.2d 875, 478 N.Y.S.2d 864, 467 N.E.2d 528) and that the award of damages should have been $3,345.72, reflecting the total amount of plaintiff's medical treatment expenses not covered by insurance.
ORDERED that the order and judgment are modified, on the facts, without costs, by increasing the amount of damages awarded to plaintiff for medical expenses from $1,569 to $3,345.72, and, as so modified, affirmed.
PETERS, Justice.
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, WHITE and YESAWICH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 19, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)