Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Dennis HUFF Sr., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 15, 1997, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.
Claimant was employed as a teacher's aide by the City of Buffalo Board of Education. Although his employment came to a temporary end in June 1997 at the close of the school year, the employer notified claimant that his employment would resume in September 1997 when the next academic year began. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that claimant was ineligible for benefits during the summer of 1997 because he had been given a reasonable assurance that he would be rehired on the same terms for the 1997-1998 school year commencing in September 1997. We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board's decision (see, Matter of Huff [Sweeney], 247 A.D.2d 734, 669 N.Y.S.2d 94, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 801, 677 N.Y.S.2d 71, 699 N.E.2d 431; Matter of Huff [Sweeney], 222 A.D.2d 919, 635 N.Y.S.2d 364). We note that claimant argues here, as he has done in prior unsuccessful claims, that Labor Law § 590(11) does not apply to his situation because he normally provided services for an educational institution that accepts students year-round. However, it is undisputed that the applicable collective bargaining agreement covering claimant's employment only covers the academic year from September through June and the hiring of aides for summer school is dictated by entirely different criteria.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)