Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Alden R. KINCH, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 26, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a flight attendant until he was discharged for allegedly attempting to cheat on the annual examination required by the Federal Aviation Authority. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant had lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances. We affirm. Claimant's apparent dishonesty in cheating on his examination was sufficient to constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Van Hoose [Sweeney], 226 A.D.2d 797, 640 N.Y.S.2d 301) and was also potentially detrimental to his employer's interests in that it nullified the examination's accuracy in assessing whether he possessed the knowledge necessary to perform his job (see, Matter of Bucknor [Hudacs], 205 A.D.2d 816, 613 N.Y.S.2d 58). In his testimony, claimant denied that he had cheated on the examination and averred that his discharge was the result of discrimination on the part of the employer as well as ill will engendered by claimant's having reported his supervisor for being intoxicated on the job. The discrepancies between claimant's testimony and that of the individuals who testified on behalf of the employer, however, raised issues of credibility that lay within the province of the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Di Febbo [Sweeney], 243 A.D.2d 804, 662 N.Y.S.2d 932). As substantial evidence supports the Board's decision, it will not be disturbed.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)