Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: FACULTY TUTORING SERVICE INC., Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 15, 1996, which ruled that Faculty Tutoring Service Inc. was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to individuals working as tutors.
Faculty Tutoring Service Inc. is engaged in the business of providing tutors for children in the custody of foster care agencies. Faculty solicits resumes from teachers available for tutoring and assigns them to individual students. Each assigned tutor fills out a form provided by Faculty, reporting the number of sessions and the progress of each student, and is paid on a monthly basis by Faculty regardless of whether it has received payment from its customers. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that the tutors were Faculty's employees. We affirm. This court has held that a business that solicits the specialized services of individuals whom it then pays for providing such services to its clients “exercises sufficient control to create an employment relationship” (Matter of Stat Servs. [Hartnett], 148 A.D.2d 903, 904, 539 N.Y.S.2d 531). In such situations, the general employer, not its customer, is the entity liable for unemployment insurance contributions (see, Matter of Goldberg [Coronet Studio of Scarsdale-Hudacs], 187 A.D.2d 823, 589 N.Y.S.2d 707, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 708, 597 N.Y.S.2d 938, 613 N.E.2d 970; Matter of Educaid Inc. [Hartnett], 176 A.D.2d 420, 574 N.Y.S.2d 408, lv. denied 79 N.Y.2d 751, 579 N.Y.S.2d 651, 587 N.E.2d 289).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)