Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Rose COLOMBO, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 18, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving benefits upon a finding that she was discharged from her position as a regional administrator for the American Red Cross due to misconduct. The record establishes that claimant used the employer's letterhead to write to the Member of Congress who represented her area criticizing his performance and accusing him of inaction regarding an allegedly corrupt Federally funded housing program in her area, which had resulted in shoddy and substandard repairs being made on property owned by claimant. This letter was written without consulting her supervisor and was signed in her administrative capacity. By expressing her partisan political position on the employer's letterhead, which could be construed as an endorsement by the employer, claimant violated the employer's policy regarding standards of employee conduct and acted in a manner contrary to the employer's interest as an impartial agency (see, e.g., Matter of Blaine [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 753, 664 N.Y.S.2d 395, 396; Matter of Rothman [Sweeney], 242 A.D.2d 818, 661 N.Y.S.2d 1025). Although claimant asserted that she was fulfilling her duties as the employer's regional administrator in charge of helping the poor, the Board's finding that her conduct rose to the level of misconduct is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Bristol [New York State Elec. & Gas Corp.-Sweeney], 238 A.D.2d 644, 655 N.Y.S.2d 687, 688).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)