Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Tommie HAMMOND, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After an inspection of petitioner's cell door track revealed a razor blade with melted plastic handles, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a weapon and possession of an altered item. Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Even if, as petitioner claims, the weapon was accessible from outside his cell, it was found in an area within petitioner's control and occupied by him for over a month, giving rise to a reasonable inference that the weapon belonged to him (see Matter of Bunting v. Goord, 25 A.D.3d 845, 809 N.Y.S.2d 588 [2006]; Matter of Shackleford v. Goord, 3 A.D.3d 622, 623, 769 N.Y.S.2d 910 [2004]; Matter of Davis v. Senkowski, 306 A.D.2d 778, 761 N.Y.S.2d 538 [2003] ). This inference, together with the misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Shackleford v. Goord, supra at 623, 769 N.Y.S.2d 910). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 20, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)