Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: RONGOVIAN EMBASSY INC., Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 1996, which rescinded the decision of the Administrative Law Judge and remitted the case for further development of the record.
As the result of an audit, Rongovian Embassy Inc. was assessed additional unemployment insurance contributions totaling $1,586 for the musicians who performed at its bar and restaurant. After a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) determined that Rongovian was not an employer of the musicians within the meaning of Labor Law § 511 and overruled the initial determination. The Commissioner of Labor appealed the ALJ's determination and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board rescinded the ALJ's decision and remitted the case to correct a procedural error and to determine whether the musicians were statutory employees under Labor Law § 511(1)(b)(1-a). This appeal by Rongovian ensued.
Because the Board may remit a case “for such purposes as it may direct” (Labor Law § 621[3] ), our inquiry is limited to whether it abused its discretion in remitting this case to the ALJ (see, Matter of Dialogue Sys. v. Sweeney, 231 A.D.2d 756, 647 N.Y.S.2d 300; Matter of Centrone v. Vulcan Fuel Corp., 102 A.D.2d 969, 970, 477 N.Y.S.2d 840). There is no dispute that the ALJ committed a procedural error by not advising Rongovian that it had the right to request that the field auditor be subpoenaed to testify. We agree with Rongovian that the Board abused its discretion in rescinding the ALJ's decision in its favor on this basis since it was not prejudiced by the ALJ's omission. We nevertheless affirm since we agree that it is unclear as to whether the ALJ considered the issue of whether the musicians were statutory employees.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)