Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Marjorie FORBES, Respondent. Brooklyn Center for Families in Crisis Inc., Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 9, 1996, which ruled that Brooklyn Center for Families in Crisis Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.
It is uncontested that claimant was a salaried employee of Brooklyn Center for Families in Crisis Inc. (hereinafter the Center) for two years, working as a psychiatric social worker. For the last six months of her employment, however, the Center reclassified claimant, among others, as an “independent contractor”, and claimant was paid an hourly rate for counseling the Center's clients. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that notwithstanding claimant's redesignation as an “independent contractor”, the Center exercised sufficient direction and control over her work to establish her status as an employee, thereby rendering her eligible for unemployment insurance benefits.
Hearing testimony disclosed that despite her change in title, claimant continued to treat the same patients in the same manner on the Center's premises. In addition, claimant worked under a supervisor and the Center established the fee to be charged for claimant's services. We therefore conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's ruling that claimant, together with those similarly situated, was an employee of the Center (see, Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assocs. [Roberts], 60 N.Y.2d 734, 736-737, 469 N.Y.S.2d 78, 456 N.E.2d 1201; Matter of Ortega [Neiman-Sweeney], 217 A.D.2d 725, 628 N.Y.S.2d 889). The Center's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 11, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)