Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of John S. DOLHON, Respondent. United Group Agency of New York Inc., Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeals from four decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 27, 1994, October 6, 1994, February 24, 1995, and June 20, 1995, which, inter alia, ruled that the employer was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant.
Claimant worked as a sales representative for United Group Agency of New York Inc., an insurance marketing agency. The record contains substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that United exercised sufficient direction and control over claimant's work to establish his status as an employee rather than an independent contractor (see, Matter of Rivera [State Line Delivery Serv.-Roberts ], 69 N.Y.2d 679, 682, 512 N.Y.S.2d 14, 504 N.E.2d 381, cert. denied 481 U.S. 1049, 107 S.Ct. 2181, 95 L.Ed.2d 837). United controlled the manner in which claimant conducted his interactions with prospective customers by providing him with an initial training program where he was indoctrinated with a set sales “pitch” to use in his marketing efforts. United further directed and controlled claimant by giving him sales “leads” and forbidding him from selling competitors' insurance to United's prospective customers when using the leads. In addition, claimant reported weekly to his supervisor at United at which time he would turn in all the insurance applications and premium payments he had received during the previous week.
The finding that an employment relationship existed between United and claimant was supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Luff [Hudacs], 194 A.D.2d 1003, 599 N.Y.S.2d 878; Matter of Cobb [Hudacs], 193 A.D.2d 848, 849, 597 N.Y.S.2d 504). The employer's remaining contentions, including the assertion that the matter should be remitted for a new hearing, have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.
ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 27, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)