Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Cedric GOLSTON, Appellant, v. Dale ARTUS, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered March 26, 2007 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, two counts of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree after he was involved in the robbery of a credit union. He was sentenced to various terms of imprisonment, the maximum of which was 25 years for each count of robbery in the first degree. Petitioner's conviction was later affirmed by this Court on appeal (People v. Golston, 13 A.D.3d 887, 787 N.Y.S.2d 185 [2004], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 789, 801 N.Y.S.2d 810, 835 N.E.2d 670 [2005] ). He subsequently made the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied by Supreme Court. This appeal ensued.
In support of his application, petitioner claims that County Court did not have jurisdiction over him because his arraignment was defective. This claim, however, was previously raised on direct appeal and rejected by this Court (id. at 888, 787 N.Y.S.2d 185). Inasmuch as petitioner bases his application on the same ground that he raised on direct appeal, habeas corpus relief is unavailable (see People ex rel. Govan v. Bennett, 304 A.D.2d 996, 758 N.Y.S.2d 701 [2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 508, 764 N.Y.S.2d 235, 795 N.E.2d 1244 [2003]; People ex rel. Moore v. Miller, 244 A.D.2d 735, 735, 664 N.Y.S.2d 388 [1997], lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 808, 669 N.Y.S.2d 261, 692 N.E.2d 130 [1998] ). Therefore, Supreme Court properly denied the application.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 17, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)