Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eleni ZAHOUDANIS, a/k/a Helen Zahoudanis, deceased. Mary Zahoudanis, objectant-respondent-appellant, John Michael Spanakos, executor-respondent; Kenneth Allen Habel, nonparty-appellant-respondent.
In an accounting proceeding, the nonparty, Kenneth Allen Habel, the attorney for the executor, appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Feinberg, S.), dated January 9, 2004, as, upon sustaining certain objections to the second supplemental account of the executor, directed him to repay an attorney's fee in the sum of $10,000 to the estate, and the objectant cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of the decree which, inter alia, denied her motion to hold the executor in contempt of court.
ORDERED that the decree is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof directing the nonparty-appellant-respondent to repay an attorney's fee in the sum of $10,000 to the estate; as so modified, the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Surrogate's Court erred in sustaining the objectant's extremely belated objection to an award of an attorney's fee made in a 1992 decree. Not only was the attorney's fee left intact upon this court's 1994 decision and order affirming the decree, as modified (see Matter of Zahoudanis, 205 A.D.2d 547, 548, 612 N.Y.S.2d 667), but, in addition, this court, in a subsequent order dated December 17, 2001, affirmed the Surrogate's refusal to permit the objectant to interpose amended, new, or additional objections to the second supplemental accounting or prior accountings (see Matter of Zahoudanis, 289 A.D.2d 412, 413, 734 N.Y.S.2d 890; Matter of Cochran, 169 Misc. 138, 139, 7 N.Y.S.2d 133).
The objectant's contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 18, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)