Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SUNRISE MANOR CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION, o/b/o Mildred GRONERT, appellant, v. Antonia C. NOVELLO, etc., et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Antonia C. Novello, Commissioner of the State of New York Department of Health, dated December 23, 2003, which, after an administrative fair hearing, denied Mildred Gronert's application for Medicaid benefits due to the fact that she possessed $32,344.80 in non-exempt resources.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
There is no dispute as to the facts of this case. The issues framed by the pleadings submitted to the Supreme Court involved questions of law only, and no “substantial evidence” question (CPLR 7803[4] ) was, in fact, presented. Thus, the transfer of the proceeding to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g) was improper. This court may nevertheless entertain the proceeding and determine the issues raised on the merits (see Matter of Frey v. O'Reagan, 216 A.D.2d 565, 566, 629 N.Y.S.2d 444; Matter of Tutino v. Perales, 153 A.D.2d 181, 185, n. 3, 550 N.Y.S.2d 21).
Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, the respondent Antonia C. Novello, as Commissioner of the State of New York Department of Health, correctly denied Mildred Gronert's application for Medicaid benefits (see 18 NYCRR § 360-4.5[b][1][ii]; Matter of Vitale v. Woodhouse, 270 A.D.2d 951, 706 N.Y.S.2d 292; Matter of Frey v. O'Reagan, supra ). In addition to the reasons given after the fair hearing, we note that the principal of the Gronert Irrevocable Trust, absent a contrary provision in the trust instrument, was an available resource which could be used to provide for Mildred Gronert's needs (see EPTL 7-1.6[b]; Matter of Tutino v. Perales, supra at 186-187, 550 N.Y.S.2d 21).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)