Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael CHIOVARO, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered October 12, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.
Defendant, an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, was indicted and charged with promoting prison contraband in the first degree. Following an unsuccessful attempt to have the indictment dismissed on the ground of prearrest delay, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 1/212 to 3 years. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. The record reflects that defendant was discovered in possession of a razor blade on October 9, 1998. The incident was reported to the State Police on November 21, 1998 and, following an investigation by the State Police, the matter was referred to the District Attorney on March 31, 1999. On April 26, 1999, six months and 17 days after the incident occurred, the matter was presented to the Grand Jury. While it is undisputed that an unreasonable and unjustifiable delay in prosecuting a defendant may necessitate dismissal of an indictment (see, People v. Johnson, 226 A.D.2d 806, 807, 640 N.Y.S.2d 336, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 937, 647 N.Y.S.2d 171, 670 N.E.2d 455), the minimal delay here of six months did not result in a deprivation of defendant's due process rights, especially inasmuch as defendant has neither claimed nor demonstrated any prejudice by reason of such delay (see, e.g., People v. Smith, 272 A.D.2d 713, 714, 710 N.Y.S.2d 648, lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 871, 715 N.Y.S.2d 226, 738 N.E.2d 374; People v. Allah, 264 A.D.2d 902, 903, 696 N.Y.S.2d 92; People v. Medina, 262 A.D.2d 708, 710, 693 N.Y.S.2d 632, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 1023, 697 N.Y.S.2d 582, 719 N.E.2d 943).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
CREW III, J.
CARDONA, P.J., MUGGLIN, ROSE and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 18, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)