Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: AMBUS INC., d/b/a Winston American Coach, et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner, New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated April 30, 1999, which, after a hearing, sustained various charges against the petitioners and imposed penalties.
ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the determination with respect to Charge No. 9 of Case No. BDCU96-182 against Ambus, Inc., d/b/a Winston American Coach, and Charge No. 5 of Case No. BDCU96-183 against Winston American Transportation, Inc., which found violations of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 509-g(1) and 15 NYCRR 6.11 and 6.12, is annulled, the penalties imposed with respect to those charges are vacated, those charges are dismissed, the determination is otherwise confirmed, and the proceeding is otherwise dismissed on the merits.
Judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body after a hearing is limited to whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence upon the entire record (see, CPLR 7803[4]; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183; Matter of Liuzzo v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals Bd., 209 A.D.2d 618, 619 N.Y.S.2d 654). The respondent's determination imposing penalties against the petitioners for their failure to file a pre-employment physical examination of a driver purportedly in their employ was not based upon substantial evidence, inasmuch as it was uncontroverted that the petitioners did not, in fact, hire the person named in the charges. Accordingly, the charges and penalties associated therewith must be dismissed.
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 29, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)