Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John COATS, Appellant, v. Brion D. TRAVIS, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Stein, J.), entered October 12, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.
Petitioner, serving a sentence of 6 1/212 years to life for a 1989 conviction of murder in the second degree, made his fifth appearance before the Board of Parole on August 19, 2003. Following the parole interview hearing, petitioner's request for parole release was denied. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.
During the pendency of this appeal, a de novo parole release interview was scheduled due to an error by the Board in not properly considering petitioner's earned eligibility certificate pursuant to Correction Law § 805. Inasmuch as the rehearing was conducted on May 10, 2005, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Hall v. New York State Div. of Parole, 18 A.D.3d 1036, 795 N.Y.S.2d 778 [2005]; Matter of Torres v. State of New York, 15 A.D.3d 742, 788 N.Y.S.2d 869 [2005] ). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714-715, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876 [1980] ).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 28, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)