Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kalongi MAHON, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
During a pat frisk, a correction officer discovered a packet of paper in petitioner's pocket and set it aside. When petitioner lunged for the packet, he knocked the officer to the ground and a struggle ensued. With the assistance of other correction officers, petitioner was subdued before ingesting the packet. Thereafter, he was charged in two misbehavior reports with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, refusing a direct order and violating search and frisk procedures. At the subsequent tier III disciplinary hearing, the charges contained in one of the reports were dismissed as redundant. Petitioner pleaded guilty to refusing a direct order and violating search and frisk procedures, and was ultimately found guilty of all remaining charges at the conclusion of the hearing. The determination of guilt was upheld on administrative appeal, but the penalty was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of two of the officers involved in the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt with respect to the charge of assaulting staff (see Matter of Ratliff v. Goord, 13 A.D.3d 772, 772-773, 785 N.Y.S.2d 614 [2004], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 708, 796 N.Y.S.2d 581, 829 N.E.2d 674 [2005]; Matter of Rosario v. Goord, 12 A.D.3d 758, 759, 783 N.Y.S.2d 726 [2004] ). Petitioner's claim of retaliation presented a question of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Brown v. Goord, 11 A.D.3d 857, 858, 783 N.Y.S.2d 151 [2004] ). His claims of impropriety concerning the Hearing Officer who presided over the hearing were not raised at the hearing and are not preserved for our review (see Matter of Lopez v. Goord, 14 A.D.3d 771, 786 N.Y.S.2d 852 [2005] ), and his remaining claims lack merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 28, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)