Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant, v. Candita NUNEZ, et al., respondents-respondents; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, proposed additional respondent-respondent, et al., proposed additional respondent.
In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated December 5, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a framed-issue hearing in accordance herewith, and for a new determination of the petition thereafter.
The petitioner made a prima facie showing of entitlement to a stay of arbitration by submitting the police accident report and the Department of Motor Vehicles registration record which each showed the respondent State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) as the insurer of the alleged offending vehicle at the time of the accident. However, the papers submitted in opposition raise issues of fact as to whether the automobile collision giving rise to the underlying request for arbitration was deliberate or intentional, and whether the claimants participated in staging the collision, in which case the claim sought to be arbitrated would not be covered by the uninsured provisions of the petitioner's policy (see Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Robbins, 15 A.D.3d 484, 789 N.Y.S.2d 719 [“The issue of whether the accident was ‘staged’ was a relevant, while not fully dispositive issue, and was subsumed under the issue of whether the vehicle was uninsured”]; see also State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laguerre, 305 A.D.2d 490, 759 N.Y.S.2d 531; Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Shaulskaya, 302 A.D.2d 522, 756 N.Y.S.2d 79). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a framed-issue hearing as to whether the automobile collision giving rise to the underlying request for arbitration was deliberate or intentional, and whether the claimants participated in staging the collision (see Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Robbins, supra; United Community Ins. Co. v. Gabriel, 229 A.D.2d 444, 645 N.Y.S.2d 82).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 25, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)