Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jerry REYNOLDS, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of alcohol, property damage and possession of gambling paraphernalia. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report as well as the testimony of its author who recovered the miscellaneous paraphernalia and containers of alcohol provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Johnson v. Selsky, 271 A.D.2d 770, 705 N.Y.S.2d 446). Furthermore, because the nature of alcoholic beverages is a matter of common knowledge, the correction officer's observations that the liquid substance was alcohol rendered scientific testing of the liquid unnecessary (see, Matter of Everett v. Goord, 253 A.D.2d 932, 678 N.Y.S.2d 400).
We also reject petitioner's challenge to the specificity of the misbehavior report. Although the author of the misbehavior report abbreviated the description of one of the charges, the report was sufficiently specific to enable petitioner to prepare a defense and petitioner failed to demonstrate any prejudice from the alleged defect (see, Matter of McGoey v. Selsky, 260 A.D.2d 814, 689 N.Y.S.2d 253). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that he did not receive a receipt of the hearing disposition, have been examined and are found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 21, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)