Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
U.S. ROF III Legal Title Trust 2015–1, etc., appellant, v. Shreshth Mani, respondent, et al., defendants.
Submitted—October 30, 2025
DECISION & ORDER
G/
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Laurentina S. McKetney Butler, J.), entered August 18, 2023. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied those branches of the motion of nonparty Palm Avenue Hialeah Trust which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Shreshth Mani, to strike that defendant's answer and counterclaims, for an order of reference, and to substitute nonparty Palm Avenue Hialeah Trust as the plaintiff.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v. TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144).
In May 2019, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant Shreshth Mani (hereinafter the defendant), among others, to foreclose a consolidated mortgage on a condominium unit located in Queens. The defendant interposed a verified answer, asserting several affirmative defenses, including the plaintiff's lack of standing, as well as counterclaims.
In January 2023, alleging to be the plaintiff's assignee, nonparty Palm Avenue Hialeah Trust (hereinafter Palm Avenue) moved, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant, to strike the defendant's answer and counterclaims, for an order of reference, and to substitute Palm Avenue as the plaintiff. The defendant opposed Palm Avenue's motion. The Supreme Court denied those branches of Palm Avenue's motion. The plaintiff appeals.
The appeal by the plaintiff must be dismissed, as the plaintiff, which did not join in Palm Avenue's motion, is not aggrieved thereby (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v. TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144).
DUFFY, J.P., WOOTEN, HOM and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2023–11733
Decided: May 13, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)