Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Daryl JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Keith DUBRAY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in two separate misbehavior reports with engaging in violent conduct, attempting to assault a staff member, refusing a direct order and committing an unhygienic act. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the related documentation, photographs and testimony adduced at the hearing, comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Boley v. Selsky, 50 A.D.3d 1411, 1412, 857 N.Y.S.2d 288 [2008] ). To the extent that petitioner offered a retaliation defense, a credibility issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Kearney v. Fischer, 51 A.D.3d 1185, 1186, 856 N.Y.S.2d 740 [2008] ). Petitioner's assertion that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance is unsubstantiated by the record and, in any event, there is no indication that he suffered any prejudice as a result of the purported deficiencies (see Matter of Gonzalez v. Fischer, 53 A.D.3d 945, 946, 861 N.Y.S.2d 525 [2008] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied the right to present witness testimony and that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been scrutinized and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)